9. Supported Features¶
The protocol- and policy-level features Pepsi supports, with the governing RFC for each: the SMTP and authentication machinery, the end-to-end cryptography, and the operational surface around both. The RFC Index cross-references every RFC to the code and configuration; the per-program chapters list which program realises each feature.
9.1. Inbound SMTP reception¶
pepsi-ingress is a standards SMTP server (RFC 5321) with these extensions:
Transport security. Cleartext, STARTTLS (RFC 3207) upgrade, and implicit TLS (RFC 8314, e.g. the submissions port 465) — selected per listener via
MODE. Submission listeners (RFC 6409,SUBMISSION = yes) may be bound — see Message submission.Message body transfer. Classic
DATAand CHUNKING/BDAT (RFC 3030) for large messages.BINARYMIMEis not advertised, and aMAIL FROMcarryingBODY=BINARYMIMEis refused with501 5.5.4.SIZE advertisement and enforcement (
MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE; oversize → 552).PIPELINING and ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES.
8BITMIME (RFC 6152) and SMTPUTF8 (RFC 6531) — see Internationalised and 8-bit content.
DSN (RFC 3461) — see Delivery Status Notifications.
SMTP AUTH (RFC 4954) for submission — see Client authentication.
Acceptance policy: mail is accepted only for
ACCEPTED_DOMAINS(others are rejected as relaying with550); the domainless<Postmaster>mailbox is always accepted (RFC 5321 §4.5.1); recipients that are valid SRS tokens are reverse-decoded and relayed (see Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS)).Durability: the client is told
250only after the row is committed; if the database is unavailable the client gets a transient451and retries.
9.2. Trace headers¶
Ingress prepends an RFC 5321 §4.4 Received: header to every message before
authentication (so the ARC seal covers it). The with clause records the
transmission type — SMTP, ESMTP, ESMTPS, ESMTPA or ESMTPSA —
per RFC 3848 (the bare ESMTPA, authenticated but not over TLS, is the local
UNIX submission socket), and a for clause names the recipient for
single-recipient transactions.
9.3. Client authentication¶
Each listener can authenticate the connecting client and mark its mail as
locally originated (which lets it relay onward to any domain and stamps
ESMTPSA in the Received: trace). A session is authenticated when any of
four per-listener mechanisms succeeds:
the peer IP is in the listener’s
MYNETWORKS(trusted up front);an SMTP AUTH exchange succeeds (RFC 4954,
PLAIN/LOGIN), verified against a configured SASL backend (SASL_TYPE/SASL_PATH; Dovecot’s auth-client socket today).AUTHis advertised and accepted only over TLS — a cleartext attempt is refused with504 5.5.4, the code RFC 4954 §4 prescribes for a mechanism that “requires an encryption layer” (§1 deprecates the older538);a presented TLS client certificate matches a configured key/CA pin (
TLS_AUTH_CLIENT);the peer of a UNIX socket is identified by
SO_PEERCRED(AUTH_PEERCRED, the local submission socket) and its login is mapped to at least one address. This one carries a username, so it feeds the sameUSERNAME_MAPenforcement a SASL session gets.
This is distinct from Boundary authentication below, which verifies the message (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) regardless of how — or whether — the client itself authenticated. See pepsi-ingress.
9.4. Message submission¶
A listener marked SUBMISSION = yes behaves as a Message Submission Agent
(RFC 6409) instead of an MX:
authentication is mandatory — an unauthenticated
MAIL FROMis refused with530 5.7.0(so the flag requires one of the client-auth mechanisms above, and TLS on any listener that is not a local UNIX-domain socket); andsubmission fixups are applied to each accepted message: a missing
Date:(§8.2) andMessage-ID:(§8.3) are added before the message is stored; andsubmission-identity enforcement (§6) via
USERNAME_MAP: the envelopeMAIL FROMand theFrom:header must be addresses the authenticated user is permitted to use (otherwise550), and an allowedFrom:that differs from the user’s canonical identity gains aSender:header naming it (§8.1).
The flag has no effect on an MX listener.
9.5. Boundary authentication¶
Before storing a message, ingress authenticates it so the eventual receiver can still see the verdict Pepsi reached at the boundary (forwarding will break the original SPF/DKIM signals):
SPF (RFC 7208) on the
MAIL FROMidentity using the client IP.DKIM signature verification (RFC 6376 / RFC 8463).
DMARC evaluation (RFC 7489), with optional SMTP-time enforcement (
DMARC_ENFORCE→550on a definite failure under aquarantine/rejectpolicy). Authentication is otherwise fail-open: a DNS or parse error is recorded and the mail accepted.iprev / FCrDNS (RFC 8601) — does the client’s PTR forward-confirm to its IP.
An Authentication-Results header (RFC 8601) recording all of the above, stamped with the ingress hostname as
authserv-id.
9.6. Authenticated Received Chain (ARC)¶
The pepsi-stage-arc stage implements ARC (RFC 8617). It
verifies any inbound ARC chain and seals the message as our ADMD by prepending an
ARC-Authentication-Results / ARC-Message-Signature / ARC-Seal set,
signed with the single ARC_ALGORITHM (ARC permits one signature per hop).
This lets a downstream receiver trust the boundary verdict after forwarding
breaks SPF/DKIM alignment. Sealing is fail-open. Because ARC preserves an
upstream sender’s authentication across the forwarding hop, it applies only to
mail Pepsi receives: locally-originated submissions (state.local_origin)
are skipped — they are authenticated as the author domain by the DKIM-signing
stage — so the generated pipeline places ARC on the inbound branch, after the
state.local_origin split.
9.7. Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS)¶
The pepsi-stage-srs stage rewrites the envelope sender into a
local address of a Pepsi-controlled SRS_DOMAIN that HMAC-encodes the original
sender (the truncated MAC is base32-encoded, RFC 4648), so SPF passes at the
next hop. The null sender and an address already in the SRS domain are left
unchanged; an already-SRS address is re-signed in the compact SRS1 form.
Ingress performs the reverse direction: a bounce returned to a valid SRS address
is verified and relayed to the original sender, while a forged or expired token
is rejected (550).
9.8. End-to-end encryption and signing¶
pepsi-stage-encrypt encrypts a locally submitted message to each recipient, in OpenPGP (PGP/MIME, RFC 3156) or S/MIME (CMS, RFC 8551 / 5083), signed with the From: author’s own key. The signature goes inside the ciphertext.
ENABLE_PEP (on by default) is a preset of defaults modelled on the pretty
Easy privacy project: every local sender at a served domain gets an OpenPGP key
automatically, a message is signed only when it is encrypted (SIGN =
encrypted-only), and cleartext mail carries the sender’s key in an
Autocrypt: header but no signature. Any option written out explicitly still
wins; ENABLE_PEP = no makes signing opportunistic and turns the automatic
key creation off.
Every encrypted recipient gets their own ciphertext on their own queue row:
there is no recipient-list disclosure, no content key shared between
recipients, and Bcc leakage is structurally impossible. Recipients that
share an outcome share a row.
Recipient keys come from the Key management store, filled by the discovery layer (WKD, VKS, DANE, LDAP, inbound harvesting). The stage itself performs no network I/O: a recipient whose key is not cached pauses the message until a discovery service settles the request, and one with a fresh negative cache entry takes the no-key path at once.
What happens to a recipient with no key is policy — ON_NO_KEY is
cleartext, secure-link or bounce, and defaults from ENCRYPT
rather than carrying one of its own. ENCRYPT = required never degrades to
cleartext, and no cleartext outcome is ever silent — each is logged and recorded
per recipient in state.crypto.out, together with the content container
actually used and whether it was a downgrade.
The stage runs before DKIM signing, so DKIM covers the bytes actually transmitted; see Configuration for why that ordering is not optional.
9.9. Server-side decryption and verification¶
pepsi-stage-decrypt is the inbound half. For a message addressed to a recipient this host serves, it opens whatever ciphertext the message carries, verifies whatever signature it carries, records the verdict and removes any security indicator the sender forged. The user reads ordinary mail in their usual client, with no plugin involved. The exception is mail encrypted to a key the user registered from their own mail client (a client-custody key, whose private half Pepsi never holds): that is passed through unopened, for the client to decrypt.
It runs only for recipients this host serves, and for anything else does not even try. Decryption rewrites the body, which invalidates the sender’s DKIM signature; that is harmless for a message about to be filed in a mailbox here and is not for one being relayed onward. A message with both kinds of recipient is split, so the forwarded copy is the one that arrived.
The verdict vocabulary is precise. valid means the signature is sound
and the key was anchored — an X.509 chain to a configured CA, or an OpenPGP
key from a ranked discovery source. valid-untrusted means sound with a key
that could not be tied to anything, which is the state of most of the world’s
signed mail and is never reported as valid. invalid,
unverifiable and none complete the set, and where a message carries
several signatures over the same content the worst of them wins. (A signature
made outside the ciphertext is a separate class: it answers for the message
only when nothing signs the plaintext, and then never better than
valid-untrusted — see pepsi-stage-decrypt.) Only valid
sets state.signature_verified, which
pepsi-stage-check-whitelist gates a whitelist row on.
Both failure paths deliver by default, matching Pepsi’s fail-open posture on inbound SPF, DKIM and DMARC: a message we could not open is delivered still encrypted (the user may hold the key in their own client), and a bad signature is a recorded verdict rather than a delivery failure (mailing lists that rewrite bodies produce them on entirely legitimate mail). Quarantine and bounce routes exist for deployments that want them.
The result reaches the user two ways: an X-Pepsi-Crypto header with a
documented grammar, and — by default — [decrypted][verified] prepended to the
Subject in nesting order, which for most users is the only signal they will
ever see. Both depend on the same discipline: every X-Pepsi-* field and
every one of our own subject tags is removed from inbound mail before ours is
added. A private header is forgeable by definition, and that removal is the
entire basis on which it can be believed.
The key material a message carries — S/MIME signer certificates,
application/pgp-keys parts, Autocrypt headers — is read in memory to
check that message’s own signature, because most signed mail carries the
certificate that signed it. When it does not, the message pauses on a discovery
request rather than blocking on a key server, so even the first message from a
new correspondent gets a real verdict.
The decrypt stage stores none of it. All peer-key learning is a stage of its
own, pepsi-stage-autocrypt-learn, placed after the spam
verdict — which is what makes Autocrypt Level 1 §5.3’s “ignore messages the MUA
believes to be spam” implementable at all (LEARN_FROM_SPAM, default off).
An inbound pipeline without that stage verifies signatures perfectly well and
never learns a correspondent’s key.
What the decrypt stage opens is filed as plaintext — unless the recipient
registered their own mail-client key, in which case
pepsi-stage-reencrypt, placed immediately before local delivery,
seals it to that key once every reading stage is done. A per-recipient policy
(ON_NO_CLIENT_KEY) can refuse mail for a user who has no such key rather than
file it readable.
9.10. Key management, discovery and publication¶
Neither crypto stage performs network I/O of its own. Both draw on a key store in the shared schema, filled from two directions: by pepsi-keydisc — one service instance per discovery method, so a slow key server delays nobody — and by pepsi-stage-autocrypt-learn from the mail that arrives. A stage that needs a key it has not got commits what it may keep, pauses the message and enqueues a request; the service that answers releases every message parked on that address in the same round-trip.
Discovery sources, each a separate concurrently-run lookup with its own rank on a trust ladder: the Web Key Directory (advanced and direct forms), DANE
OPENPGPKEY(RFC 7929) andSMIMEA(RFC 8162) — accepted only when the resolver’s AD bit says the answer was DNSSEC-validated — the VKS protocol of a verifying key server, and LDAP. Below all of them on the ladder sit the two rungs that are not discovery services and have no instance: material harvested from inbound mail (S/MIME signer certificates,application/pgp-keysparts andAutocryptheaders), and — one rung lower still, on the very bottom — a third party’s key introduced byAutocrypt-Gossip:in a message that arrived encrypted. Both are written inline by pepsi-stage-autocrypt-learn; naming either inSOURCESis refused.Publication of our own users’ keys: the WKD endpoints served by pepsi-httpd,
OPENPGPKEY/SMIMEArecords printed by pepsi-keys and pepsi-setup, and — only when asked for, per identity — upload to a verifying key server, whose confirmation mail pepsi-stage-vks-confirm answers.Custody. Private material is stored wrapped under a key-encryption key that lives outside the database, and is reachable only by the one database role the crypto stages run as.
A negative cache means only the first message to or from an unknown correspondent ever waits.
Key management is the chapter on all of this; the option reference is pepsi.conf(5).
9.11. The secure-link fallback¶
Most correspondents publish no key, so ENCRYPT = required would otherwise
leave only “bounce it” or “send it in the clear”. The secure-link portal is
the third answer: pepsi-stage-secure-link stores the message on
the server — encrypted under a freshly generated PIN — and mails the recipient a
link, while the PIN reaches them by another channel (by default it is mailed to
the sender, who relays it). The recipient reads the message in a browser, can
download its attachments, and, where the operator enables it, reply.
The content key is Argon2id over the PIN, a per-message salt and a pepper that
lives only in secrets.d, and only the AEAD ciphertext is stored — so a
stolen database yields nothing, a stolen server yields nothing, and no
administrator can read a stored message. The subject travels inside the
ciphertext with the body; the sender, recipient, timestamps and lifecycle
counters are in the clear because delivery, expiry and “did this reach them?”
need them. A lost PIN is a lost message, and the recovery path is that the
sender re-sends.
Messages are rendered as text, never as HTML, so there is no sanitiser to be
bypassed and no remote content to phone home; a wrong PIN is bounded by a
per-token lockout and a per-source rate limit; and a reply is injected without
state.local_origin, addressed only to the stored sender, so the public form
cannot become an open relay. See The secure-link fallback portal for the flow, the threat model
and the configuration.
9.12. Outbound DKIM signing¶
The pepsi-stage-dkim-sign stage prepends DKIM signatures
(RFC 6376) — both an RSA-2048 and an Ed25519 (RFC 8463) signature by
default, or either alone under [pepsi] DKIM_ALGORITHMS — under the
SIGNING_DOMAIN or the message’s From: domain. Gmail, Microsoft 365 and
Yahoo do not verify Ed25519, and Google lists such a signature as fail in its
DMARC aggregate reports; DMARC still passes on the RSA signature. The signature always
covers the whole body: RFC 6376’s l= body-length tag is never emitted, since
strict verifiers reject such a signature outright rather than tolerating the
shorter coverage. Signing is fail-closed: a message whose signing domain has no
keys, or that cannot be signed, is marked failed rather than sent on
unsigned. Because header selection is bottom-up,
the signature does not disturb existing signatures.
9.13. Delivery Status Notifications¶
Pepsi implements DSN end to end (RFC 3461 / RFC 3463 / RFC 3464):
Ingress advertises
DSNand validates/storesRET/ENVID(onMAIL FROM) andNOTIFY/ORCPT(onRCPT TO) understate.dsn.The relay stages propagate those parameters to a next hop that also advertises
DSN, and omit them otherwise (RFC 3461 §6 — Pepsi does not become the DSN-responsible relay).pepsi-stage-bounce emits the report as an RFC 3464
multipart/reportwith RFC 3463 enhanced status codes:a failure report when
NOTIFYrequestsFAILURE(the default when absent) —NOTIFY=NEVERdrops silently;a success report (
Action: delivered) only when the globalORIGINATE_SUCCESS_DSNis set andNOTIFY=SUCCESSwas requested;a delay report (
Action: delayed) when a relay stage’sDELAY_DSN_AFTERelapses on a still-queued message that asked forNOTIFY=DELAY(sent at most once).
A null-sender message (a bounce) is never itself bounced (RFC 5321 §6.1).
9.14. Internationalised and 8-bit content¶
Ingress advertises 8BITMIME (RFC 6152) and SMTPUTF8 (RFC 6531) and records
the BODY= declaration. Because a next hop’s capabilities are unknown until
after connection, the outbound SMTP client decides per hop:
If the hop supports the extension, Pepsi re-advertises
BODY=8BITMIME/SMTPUTF8.Otherwise it downgrades: 8-bit MIME leaf parts are re-encoded to a 7-bit transfer-encoding (RFC 2045 — quoted-printable for
text/*, base64 otherwise), on the evidence of the octets rather than of the declared encoding; UTF-8 header fields are rewritten as RFC 2047 encoded-words, in the three places RFC 2047 §5 allows one (an unstructured field, a display-name phrase, the inside of a comment); a non-ASCIIContent-Type/Content-Dispositionparameter — an attachment’s filename, in any MIME part — takes the RFC 2231 form (filename*=UTF-8''caf%C3%A9.txt), and a non-ASCIIboundary=, which has no encoded form, is replaced by a fresh ASCII one together with the delimiter lines.The downgraded bytes are then re-tested: conversion is best-effort over a message nobody validated, and RFC 6152 §3 forbids offering 8-bit content to a hop that did not advertise
8BITMIME“under any circumstances”, so a body that is still 8-bit afterwards is a permanent failure (bounce) instead.A non-ASCII address (envelope, or inside a header address) that cannot be represented to a non-
SMTPUTF8hop is a permanent failure (bounce).
Body re-encoding necessarily breaks a body-covering DKIM/ARC signature; this is unavoidable (capabilities are late-bound) and rare.
9.15. Outbound relay¶
Two interchangeable relay stages send mail off-site:
pepsi-stage-relay-to-internet — direct-to-MX delivery (RFC 5321 §5): its own
MXlookup with preference ordering and Happy-Eyeballs address selection (cached per address inpepsi.dns_address), implicit MX via address records (§5.1), and Null MX handling (RFC 7505). TLS is authenticated by MTA-STS (RFC 8461) with certificate identity checks (RFC 6125);enforcepolicies require STARTTLS to a listed MX.pepsi-stage-relay-to-smarthost — relay through a configured smarthost, chosen by recipient domain (or a catch-all), with per-MTA transport (
plain/tls/starttls), certificate verification and the full SMTP AUTH (RFC 4954) suite —PLAIN/LOGIN,CRAM-MD5,SCRAM-SHA-1/-SHA-256(with optional-PLUSchannel binding),OAUTHBEARER/XOAUTH2, SASLEXTERNAL(TLS client certificate),NTLM,GSSAPI/Kerberos and the deprecatedDIGEST-MD5— orautonegotiation. See Client authentication and the RFC index.
Both stages apply the loop guard, counting the message’s Received:
headers against their own MAX_HOP_COUNT option — it is a relay-stage
setting in each stage’s [stage-<name>] section, not an ingress one, so a
message is stopped when it is about to be sent on again rather than when it
arrives.
Both stages authenticate the next hop’s TLS with DANE (RFC 7672, DANE =
off|warn|strict) — looking up the hop’s TLSA records and matching them
against the presented chain, taking precedence over MTA-STS — and, when
[pepsi-tlsrpt] SEND_REPORTS is on (it is off by default), record every
outbound TLS session for TLS Reporting (RFC 8460);
pepsi-tlsrpt ships the daily aggregate reports. They share retry semantics: a transient failure
pauses the message with exponential backoff (RETRY_INITIAL/
RETRY_MAX_INTERVAL/RETRY_FACTOR) until MAX_LIFETIME, after which it is
bounced or failed; a permanent failure routes to BOUNCE_STAGE (or marks the
row failed).
9.16. Local delivery¶
For recipients in a local domain, three stages file the mail on the host instead
of relaying it (each forwards the recipients it cannot handle to its
NEXT_STAGE, so they compose):
pepsi-stage-relay-to-maildir — writes the message directly into each local user’s
Maildir/new/. Locality is decided byLOCAL_DOMAINSandTARGETS(passwduidranges); the privileged write is done by the setuid-rootpepsi-helper-maildir-writer, reached through the stage’s ownpepsi-maildirset-group-id bit.pepsi-stage-relay-to-lmtp — hands the message to a local Mail Delivery Agent (typically Dovecot) over LMTP (RFC 2033), which runs each recipient’s Sieve (RFC 5228) filter as it files the mail. It delivers all recipients in one transaction and routes each one the MDA rejects onward by its RFC 3463 status. Needs no privileged helper (the MDA drops privilege).
pepsi-stage-dot-forward — processes each local user’s
~/.forwardfile (the classic sendmail/Postfix mechanism) via the setuid-rootpepsi-helper-dot-forward, which drops to the user before reading it: forwarded addresses restart the pipeline,|pipe//filedirectives run as the user, and a recipient with no~/.forwardpasses through unchanged.
pepsi-stage-aliases complements these by expanding envelope
recipients through a Postfix virtual(5)-style map (full-address or
@domain catch-all, expanded transitively) before local delivery.
pepsi-stage-vacation answers mail that arrives while a recipient is
away, and tags the forwarded copy’s subject so they can see on their return which
mail was answered for them. It is the one user-filtering action Pepsi implements
itself rather than leaving to an MDA’s Sieve, because the reply is a new message
that has to be signed and relayed — and because deciding not to send one is
pipeline knowledge: RFC 3834 says never answer a bounce, mailing-list mail,
anything already marked automatic, or a service address, and Pepsi adds its own
“never answer spam” and a per-correspondent rate limit. Leave dates are ordinary
per-address configuration, so the same option is a national holiday at global scope
and one person’s holiday in their own pepsi.settings row.
pepsi-stage-route complements them differently: instead of
delivering, it chooses a next hop per recipient from that recipient’s domain,
splitting the message when its recipients disagree. It is what lets Pepsi front
an existing mail system — the domains behind the gateway go to that system, the
rest go to the internet — and it is where pepsi-setup proves no domain this
host serves can be routed back into its own ingress. See Microsoft Exchange as a gateway.
9.17. Mailing lists and archives¶
Pepsi’s mailing-list subsystem is a reimplementation of GNU Mailman 3: its
data model, its rule/chain and handler/pipeline architecture, its REST API, its
e-mail command vocabulary and its notice-template names are the GNU Mailman
project’s design, copyright the Free Software Foundation, and files taken from
GNU Mailman, Postorius or HyperKitty remain under the GNU General Public License
(vendor/PEPSI-VENDORING.md lists them). The acceptance test is that an
unmodified mailmanclient, Postorius or HyperKitty drives it. See
Mailing lists, Archives and The GNU Mailman 3 REST API.
Five pipeline stages rather than a daemon of its own: routing, posting, per-member delivery, e-mail commands and bounce processing — so a list post is an ordinary queue row that ARC, DKIM, SRS, TLS and the relay stages already handle. How the subsystem is put together is the map.
Nine addresses per list and no alias file. Mailman writes Postfix or Exim maps for every list’s nine addresses and reloads the MTA; Pepsi routes on the recipient inside its own pipeline, so there is nothing to regenerate and nothing to get out of sync.
Moderation with upstream’s vocabulary: eighteen rules, four terminal chains (
accept,hold,reject,discard) and a seventeen-handler pipeline, with the names the REST API reports.RFC 2369 ``List-*`` headers and RFC 5064 ``Archived-At`` on every post.
RFC 8058 one-click unsubscribe —
List-Unsubscribe-Postplus a keyedhttps:URI, honoured with a singlePOST. Upstream does not have it, and it is the one place Pepsi exceeds it.Digests in both formats: the RFC 1153 plain digest and the MIME
multipart/digest, per subscriber, with volume/issue numbering, a size threshold and a periodic timer.Bounce processing with upstream’s scoring machine, VERP attribution on every copy (so the seventeen heuristic detectors are the fallback rather than the mechanism), optional probes, warnings and eventual unsubscription.
An archive — a reimplementation of HyperKitty, keeping its Message-ID hash and URL scheme so existing archive links survive a migration — with full-text search, optional trigram substring search, mbox import and export, and a
purgethat leaves a tombstone.Migration from Mailman 2.1 and 3: the 2.1
config.pckis read with a restricted pickle machine that cannot instantiate a class (so an untrusted pickle is data, not code), and a Mailman 3 site is read over its own REST API.No JavaScript on any list or archive page, and no
403on a public surface: a refusal is the same404a nonexistent list gets, because a403discloses existence.
9.18. Unsolicited mail¶
Pepsi filters after it has accepted a message, so everything below decides what
happens to mail already in the queue. Three mechanisms cooperate through one
verdict, state.spam, and one table, pepsi.whitelist:
The correspondent whitelist. pepsi-stage-auto-whitelist records the recipients of mail your users send; pepsi-stage-check-whitelist recognises their replies (optionally only when DKIM, a verified signature or a named ARC sealer vouches for them) and sets
state.spam = false. The operator and users can manage it by hand with pepsi-whitelist.Pay-to-send (pepsi-stage-anti-spam): mail from anybody else is held until its sender pays a small GNU Taler amount.
Confirm-to-send (pepsi-stage-secretary): mail from anybody else is held until its sender replies once to a challenge. The reply whitelists them, so a correspondent is asked once, ever.
Post-queue milters (SpamAssassin, rspamd, ClamAV, …) and the language filter can set or inform the verdict as well; see pepsi-stage-milter.
9.18.2. Pay-to-send and confirm-to-send compared¶
Both hold unknown senders’ mail and both send the sender one null-sender auto-reply, in their language. They differ in what the sender has to prove:
Pay-to-send |
Confirm-to-send |
|
|---|---|---|
The sender proves |
they will spend money on this message |
they can read mail at the address they wrote from |
Stops |
bulk mail at any volume, including from working mailboxes |
bulk mail from addresses that cannot receive (most of it) |
Does not stop |
a sender willing to pay |
a spammer with a working mailbox, who can automate the reply |
Deterrent |
economic: every message costs |
legal only: |
Needs |
a GNU Taler merchant backend, and a wallet on the sender’s side |
nothing but a reply |
Stated plainly: confirm-to-send is the weaker filter. It is still worth running,
because it costs a legitimate correspondent one reply and costs a mail server
nothing to operate — and the two combine. With both enabled, the secretary runs
first and its UNCHALLENGEABLE_STAGE points at the paywall, so mail that cannot
be asked to reply (a list posting, an unauthenticated or forged sender, a sender
over the daily challenge cap) is asked to pay instead, while a confirmed sender
reaches the paywall with state.spam = false and passes it untouched.
Confirm-to-send is careful about backscatter, since its challenge goes to the
envelope sender and spam’s envelope sender is usually forged: it challenges only a
sender that passed SPF or DMARC (REQUIRE_AUTHENTICATED) and whose From: is
that same address, at most MAX_CHALLENGES_PER_SENDER times a day across all
users; it never answers what RFC 3834 says not to; and its challenge quotes nothing
of the held message but a short hint of its subject (SUBJECT_HINT_LENGTH,
eight characters by default).
9.18.3. Spam filters and the secretary¶
By default spam-scoring milters (SpamAssassin through spamass-milter, rspamd, MIMEDefang, …) stay ahead of the whitelist check, and pepsi-setup’s wizard generates that order:
… → milter-spamassassin → check-whitelist → secretary → local
UNCHALLENGEABLE_STAGE = local
A message the filter rejects never reaches the secretary, so obvious spam draws no
challenge to its forged sender — that is backscatter avoided. What does reach the
secretary has passed the filter, which is why the wizard sets
UNCHALLENGEABLE_STAGE to the secretary’s own NEXT_STAGE: running the filter
again would scan twice.
The alternative is to move the filter behind the secretary, so it scans only mail that could not be challenged:
… → check-whitelist → secretary → local
└─ UNCHALLENGEABLE_STAGE → milter-spamassassin → local
The configuration edit, for a filter at [stage-milter-spamassassin]:
Take the filter out of the main chain: set the
NEXT_STAGEof the stage that pointed at it to the filter’s ownNEXT_STAGE(normallycheck-whitelist).In
[stage-secretary], setUNCHALLENGEABLE_STAGE = milter-spamassassin.In
[stage-milter-spamassassin], setNEXT_STAGEto the secretary’sNEXT_STAGE(herelocal).
Then run pepsi-setup check (or run) to validate the graph.
The trade-off cuts both ways:
For: the filter’s CPU is spent only on the mail that needs it. Whitelisted mail and mail from confirmed senders — the bulk of a personal mailbox — is never scanned.
Against: challenges now go out unscanned. Spam the filter would have rejected draws a challenge first, which is more backscatter to forged senders (bounded by
REQUIRE_AUTHENTICATEDand the daily cap, but not zero); and spam whose sender does confirm — the one kind confirm-to-send cannot stop — is delivered without the filter ever seeing it.
Whichever layout you choose, virus and policy milters stay on the main path (ahead of the whitelist check): a confirmed or whitelisted correspondent can still send malware, from a compromised account or unknowingly, and a policy filter’s verdict applies to everybody.
9.19. Operational features¶
Single-table pipeline with crash recovery: orphaned
runningrows are reset on dispatcher start-up; in-flight children are reset on shutdown.Elastic, pipelined worker pools and watchdog: each stage runs persistent worker processes started on demand up to its
PARALLELISMand reaped afterWORKER_IDLE_TIMEOUT, recycled afterMAX_MESSAGES; each worker is fed up toQUEUE_LIMITmessages at once (in-flight capacityQUEUE_LIMIT × PARALLELISM, at no extra connection cost), and a worker exceedingMAX_RUNTIMEon its head-of-line message is killed (timeout) and replaced.Queue tooling: pepsi-queue lists, deletes, re-stages and bulk-unsticks messages.
Health monitoring: pepsi-status prints a read-only summary of the queue, stuck messages, cumulative delivery/failure counters and recent outbound TLS outcomes (also as
--json), suitable for running over SSH.Provisioning and DNS verification: pepsi-setup installs the schema, generates keys and prints/validates DNS (DKIM, SPF, MTA-STS).
HTTP server: pepsi-httpd serves, over one or more TLS (SNI-selected) or plaintext listeners, the MTA-STS policy file (
/.well-known/mta-sts.txt), a Prometheus/metricspage (on anADMIN = yeslistener only — it describes the pipeline), the Web Key Directory endpoints that publish this deployment’s own identities (/.well-known/openpgpkey/…, direct and advanced forms), the The secure-link fallback portal portal, and the mail autoconfiguration document below.Mail client autoconfiguration (draft-ietf-mailmaint-autoconfig): a client given nothing but
fred@example.orgfetcheshttps://autoconfig.example.org/mail/config-v1.1.xmland configures itself — submission host, port, transport security and authentication, and the same for the mailbox server. The submission half is derived from the running submission listener, so it cannot drift from the server it describes; the mailbox half names whatever MDA the deployment pairs with. Served publicly and without authentication, as the draft requires, because a client must read it before it can know how to authenticate.Administrative API and console: on a listener explicitly flagged
ADMIN = yes— and never on one that would carry it in cleartext off the host — the same server exposes the The administrative API under/api/v1(queue, health, configuration, key store, audit and mail logs) and the browser The administration console under/ui, which is a client of exactly that API. Everywhere else those paths answer the same404an unknown path gets. Authentication is by UNIX socket peer credentials, a session cookie or a bearer token, and every principal carries scopes; all of it is audited.Metrics:
pepsi-dispatchrecords per-stage throughput, kills/timeouts, crashes and processing time and the global stage/message totals (flushed to the database in one transaction roughly once a minute), exported bypepsi-httpdalongside live active/paused gauges read from the queue.Structured logging via
tracingat configurable levels.
For standards Pepsi does not implement (BINARYMIME among them), see
Applicable RFCs not yet implemented.
9.20. Feature stability¶
Every feature described in this chapter is tracked in a single
Feature stability table, which records — per feature — its governing RFC,
whether it has an automated test (and of what kind: U unit, I
integration, I/U both), whether it has been verified by hand, and how widely
it is deployed and exercised according to anonymous, opt-in usage telemetry
(pepsi-telemetry).
That table is generated: contrib/update-feature-stability.sh merges the
hand-maintained registry contrib/feature-registry.tsv (name, RFC, test and
manual-test columns) with a pepsi-telemetry GET /telemetry/report (the
deployment and usage counts). See Extending the Pipeline for how to keep it current
when you add a feature, write a test, or refresh the telemetry counts.